Roussouly classification: the four shapes of the sagittal spine
The Roussouly classification groups the normal variation in the sagittal shape of the lumbar spine and pelvis, standing, into four types. It is read on a lateral radiograph: the pelvis tells which shape the spine was built for, and the sacral slope tells which shape it stands in today. (Roussouly 2005)
The idea: the pelvic incidence is the signature
The pelvic incidence (PI) is anatomical. It does not change with posture or with degeneration, and PI = pelvic tilt (PT) + sacral slope (SS). (Legaye 1998)
The sacral slope orders the lordosis. In 160 volunteers, the overall lordosis, its inclination, the position of the apex and the number of lordotic vertebrae were determined by the slope. Four shapes follow from that. (Roussouly 2005)
Degeneration disguises the shape. As lordosis is lost the patient tips the pelvis back, the slope falls, and a type 4 spine can look like a type 2. The original shape is recognized only by the incidence: a very retroverted pelvis with a high incidence was certainly a type 4, and a large lordosis has to be restored. (Roussouly & Pinheiro-Franco 2011)
The current type: sacral slope and apex
The slope cuts are 35° and 45°. The apex of the lordosis is placed at the center of L5 (type 1), the base of L4 (type 2), the center of L4 (type 3) and the base of L3 or higher (type 4). (Roussouly 2005)
| Type | Sacral slope | Apex of the lordosis | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | under 35° | L5 | A short, low lordosis under a long thoracolumbar kyphosis. |
| 2 | under 35° | L4–L5 disc or above | A flat back. |
| 3 | 35° to 45° (45° exactly is type 3) | L4 | Balanced. |
| 3 with anteverted pelvis | 35° to 45°, with PT 5° or less and a low incidence | L4 | A normal variant with the pelvis anteverted. |
| 4 | over 45° | L3 or above | A long, deep lordosis. |
Type 3 with an anteverted pelvis was found in 16% of 296 asymptomatic adults: PI 48° ± 6°, PT 4° ± 3°, slope over 35°. (Laouissat 2017) The PT cut of 5° or less is the one of the school itself. (Sebaaly 2017) The MEANS study defines the anteverted variant with PT under 8°. (Shen 2024)
The theoretical type: from the incidence
Since the incidence does not change, it tells the type the spine was built for.
| Pelvic incidence | Original type |
|---|---|
| under 45° | 1 or 2 (the apex separates them: L5 is type 1) |
| 45° to 60° | 3 |
| over 60° | 4 |
One in three asymptomatic volunteers has a current type different from the theoretical one. A mismatch is therefore not by itself a disease, and the spine is a continuum, not five boxes. (Shen 2024)
The two arcs of the lordosis
The horizontal through the apex splits the lordosis in two (Berthonnaud’s construction). The lower arc, from S1 to the apex, equals the sacral slope. The upper arc, from the apex to the inflection point, is nearly constant, about 20°. So the spinal lordosis, from S1 to the inflection point whatever the number of vertebrae, is the slope plus about 20° (r = 0.89 between lordosis and slope). (Chevillotte 2022)
The upper arc of the lordosis is the lower arc of the kyphosis, so lengthening it raises the low thoracic kyphosis. (Pizones 2025)
Reference values and ideal profiles
| Type | PI | PT | SS | Spinal lordosis | Upper arc | Upper ÷ lower arc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 ± 5 | 10 ± 5 | 30 ± 4 | 51 ± 6 | 22 ± 4 | 0.76 ± 0.17 |
| 2 | 41 ± 5 | 11 ± 5 | 30 ± 4 | 48 ± 6 | 18 ± 5 | 0.60 ± 0.18 |
| 3 anteverted | 45 ± 4 | 6 ± 4 | 39 ± 2 | 60 ± 5 | 21 ± 4 | 0.53 ± 0.11 |
| 3 | 56 ± 4 | 15 ± 4 | 40 ± 3 | 60 ± 6 | 20 ± 5 | 0.49 ± 0.12 |
| 4 | 62 ± 9 | 13 ± 7 | 49 ± 4 | 70 ± 6 | 20 ± 5 | 0.41 ± 0.11 |
| Type | PI | SS | LL L1–S1 | Vertebrae in lordosis | Share in L4–S1 | Apex | Inflection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | under 45° | under 35° | 45° | 3 | 90% | L5 | L3 |
| 2 | under 45° | under 35° | 50° | 4 | 80% | L4–L5 disc | L2 |
| 3 | 45° to 60° | 35° to 45° | 55° | 5 | 70% | L4 | L1 |
| 4 | over 60° | over 45° | 65° | 6 | 60% | L3–L4 disc | T12 |
In the series that proposed those ideals, getting the type and the level of the apex right mattered most; the inflection and the distribution did not reach significance. (Pizones 2019)
Degenerative shapes
In 331 patients with a degenerative spine, the sagittal shape fell into eleven types, from the slope, pelvic tilt, apex, lordosis and thoracic kyphosis. (Sebaaly 2017)
- Classical types 1 to 4.
- Anteverted (PT 5° or less): type 3 and type 4.
- Retroverted (PT 25° or more): false type 2, false type 2 with thoracic kyphosis, false type 3. Retroverted types 1 and 4 did not appear.
- Kyphotic: lumbar kyphosis with a hypokyphotic thorax that compensates, and global kyphosis without compensation.
The path of degeneration runs from type 3 to false type 2, then to false type 2 with thoracic kyphosis and on to global kyphosis. Type 4 goes to false type 3 and follows the same path. (Sebaaly 2017)
The pelvic incidence is not always constant once the pelvis is fixed with screws, and the change differs with the type of fixation. This matters when comparing the film before and after. (Daher 2025) (Daher 2026)
How ScolioSim does it
- Open Simulate, 2D, on the standing lateral film and use the Spinopelvic tab. Mark the femoral heads, the S1 endplate and the endplates of L1, L4 and the inflection point.
- Choose the lordosis apex and the inflection vertebra from the lists: you read them off the film.
- The card gives the theoretical type (from the PI) and the current type (from the SS and the apex), each measure against the range for the target type, the sacral slope and the spinal lordosis that would stand as the target type, the ideal values of that type, and the degenerative shape.
The target sacral slope is the PI minus the mean PT of the type; the target spinal lordosis is the target slope plus the mean upper arc of the type. The shape is then labeled: matched, compensated, false type, flattened, hyperlordotic or kyphotic.
The Roussouly results are published norms set against the film. They are not a forecast. The card shows the shape against the norm and says what restoring it would ask for; it gives no probability and no risk for the patient. Two margins it uses are the choice of the software’s author, not of any article: a ±10° tolerance on the spinal lordosis and half a level of margin on the apex.
Related: how a pedicle subtraction osteotomy at each lumbar level acts on the arcs is described in osteotomy planning on the radiograph; the angles themselves are explained in spinopelvic parameters.
Measure, plan and simulate on your own radiographs, in the browser. Nothing about a patient or a case is stored on a server.
Try it in ScolioSim — freeReferences
- Roussouly P, et al. (2005). Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65
- Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, et al. (1998). Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s005860050038
- Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. (2011). Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x
- Laouissat F, et al. (2017). Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x
- Shen Y, et al. (2024). Characteristics of spinal morphology according to the "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly classification systems (MEANS). Global Spine J. doi:10.1177/21925682241235611
- Chevillotte T, et al. (2022). Quantifying the spinal lordosis ratio unique to the type of spinal sagittal alignment in a normal population. Global Spine J. doi:10.1177/21925682221133748
- Pizones J, et al. (2025). Alignment goals in adult spinal deformity surgery. Global Spine J. doi:10.1177/21925682251331048
- Pizones J, et al. (2019). Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile in adult scoliosis surgery decreases the risk of mechanical complications. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-019-06176-x
- Sebaaly A, et al. (2017). Description of the sagittal alignment of the degenerative human spine. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5404-0
- Daher M, Roussouly P, et al. (2025). Is pelvic fixation a risk factor for pelvic incidence change after surgery for adult spinal deformity?. Spine. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005301
- Daher M, et al. (2026). Types of pelvic fixation and their influence on pelvic incidence change after surgery for adult spinal deformity. Spine. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005637